ANNOZERO or men and women? E 'Santoro or what is the De Filippi without makeup?
Once upon a time, in a land far, far away, the debate civil. Think about it: when a person expresses an opinion, the other stood in silence to listen! And then, just when it came his turn, began to counter the other in respectful silence spoke! Imagine: clear information and clear ... But one day came an evil dragon named showbusiness and engulfs everything and digest it and then go to the body. Thus was born the talk show. If you read the movie, the beginning of this post, you have certainly noticed that clarity and education have not been home the last episode of ANNOZERO (more or less as in previous). But because one of the few remaining programs of political information in our television be reduced to this? The answer is give the Queen "Show must go on .
Just a few simple precautions to avoid falling to such low levels of incivility. For example, mute the microphones except to those who turn to speak. That of the "talk over" is a very common tactic in political debates, on both sides, but it is especially dear to the right-wingers. It 'awesome the insistence with which, first of all, Castles (but also others not joking) stop the speeches of the representatives of the left and the arrogance with which he does not have limits. In this way prevents messages reach more uncomfortable to the ears of the public and this is a symptom of cowardice. Because if you really can fight back without any problems after you do, when it's up to you, even if you think that the other is telling lies or irrelevant things. You wait. Out of respect for others' ideas and the public that if you are watching the program because they want to hear those things. You can not override the opinion of ' audience and viewers to decide what should and should not hear: that is why there is a remote control. As I said before, eliminating the volume of the microphones of those who must listen to (and do not disturb) the problem would be solved even in that garret studio, showing also the whole cafonaggine them, so the message to the public would reach the same! And what would be mutual, would real level playing field.
Another simple trick to pull over to that to make it the par conditio : static shots on the speaker. For two reasons:
1) want to see you in the face when you talk to me, I look into your eyes, the expressions you have, how he gestures, because they are all aspects that weigh on my final decision.
2) see the face of a politician who makes faces, smiles or even grins, while his opponent speaks, it diminishes the credibility and importance of the message of the latter.
not know about you, but, at this point of my argument, I came to wonder: "Gee, it's so simple! Why do not?"
Remember I mentioned that before the Queen? " Show must go on," that's why. Because today the show , the show is more important information, even in an information program. If you really ANNOZERO take the measures that I wrote above, how many politicians would agree to stand still in the studio? How would the consciousness (and no criminal record) so neat to accept a comparison really on par with their opponents? Maybe it's just an impression, but watching the video it appeared to me that the arguments of Mr Castles, apart from rare moments like snowflakes in the desert, you are limited to insults to the public and licks misleading and totally inconsistent, likely simply to create confusion and lose their train of thought (such as when he repeats that it is not a news article on page 3, is on page 3, is on page 3 ... as if it had any significance with respect to the subject treated in the same). I wonder if this video brings to light qulalcosa in your memory:
note the difficulty with which Berlusconi faces calendar year in which a discussion can not cover the words of others. Countless comic legends born on notepads of the Prime Minister, after this confrontation, which even now is remembered as one of the worst figures made by Knight. In addition, we also know that those elections, Prodi won, as we know that he was unable to keep up the government offered by Berlusconi on a silver platter.
is not never seen a comparison of this type in our television. It will be a chance? I do not know, but I start to not believe in coincidences. And 'This is the truth, politicians are afraid to be in similar situations and that is why they are never in a program ANNOZERO as if it were based on the pattern of confrontation in 2006. And how does the program exist, how can the show go ahead if the most prominent politicians refuse to be seen? To this we must add that if the Italian television talk show is full of there must be a reason: the majority of ' audience adores them.
Santoro's not forget that before being a lover of information, there is always a showman and his work is also (if not primarily) in having high rates of share (and avoiding a second edict Bulgarian). But this does not justify such a loss quality in information and in how this is transmitted. At this rate, soon we will also interludes of uncoordinated dancers and the Friends of Mary that flutter in the audience, while Santoro, wearing a blonde wig, is proposing the new program logo:
0 comments:
Post a Comment