Asain With Big Boobs Molested On Train

White Christmas ... Why Christmas?

Author: Simo

If we hear about a lot lately:

http://www.corriere.it/cronache/09_novembre_23/giuseppe_spatola_africani_in_piazza_tensione_nel_paese_del_white_christmas_3043622a-d7fc-11de-a7cd-00144f02aabc.shtml

http://www.zenit.org/article-20405?l=italian

http://www.repubblica.it/2009/11/sezioni/cronaca/immigrati-13/viaggio-paese / travel-paese.html

http://www.libero-news.it/webeditorials/view/3655

The "White Christmas" brought forward by the Mayor of Coccaglio Franco took Claretti various forms depending on the political trend: the republic is defined on a "illegal hunt in the name of Christmas" , Corriere della Sera is a ' "operation to remove illegal immigrants" , Libero, Fini defines a "bullshit" . I am inclined to believe that all three things. As always, get a clear idea of \u200b\u200bthe scope of the matter is complicated, even in this case impossible since "while the country is discussed and comments, the administration has opted for silence." But the problem is at the root. Why Christmas?
that the management of immigration in Italy is an issue more problematic that it seems now well understood. In this connection I quote a few words uttered by Calderoli smart (pardon the paradox): "It's bullshit, to use the language of the Fini deceive the immigrants that our country is the 'Bengodi' and that there is work for all, because the work lacking in the first place for our citizens. Doing this is pure demagoguery and then you open the doors to thousands of people destined to end up in a web of illegality, crime or exploitation. It is not giving the vote to resolve the problems of 'integration: the same, yes, they are all men are born, but the' integrity and 'host not provide the fine phrases but of concrete actions and a lot of intelligence to know how to build. And, finally, equality of origin also predicts that there is a shared journey of civilization, without which it creates only the clash between peoples and cultures. "
short, even if he realizes Calderoli , means that it is obvious: the issue of integration is complicated. But certainly use Christmas as an excuse, even worse as an opportunity to make the round-ups is the most disgusting you can conceive. It 'a concentration of hypocrisy! Even the Christmas celebration in itself is a totally hypocritical, since everyone knows that Jesus Christ was not born on December 25 (you can also get there: according to you in the middle of winter the shepherds came out with the sheep grazing in the middle of the night?) and everyone knows that this is a purely consumerist recurrence of mold. Furthermore, this initiative raises the square because it hides behind the hypocrisy of Christian values \u200b\u200bto remove immigrants, many of which are Christians! How strange, I was convinced that one of the fundamental values \u200b\u200bof Christianity was the mutual love, I was convinced we were all equal, that a good Christian should do unto others what you would have done to him and so on ... I must have dreamed it all. Maybe I missed a verse, I know I'll try to update me. This is a Christmas that is not marked by the white snow, but the white hoods of the KKK!
The icing on the cake is the reaction of people:

"The name I knew him," White Christmas ", but honestly I never noticed - Romina says, behind the counter of the cafeteria Ketty - the problem is that of Christmas they do not give a damn. The name is perhaps wrong, but this, no one. They are not here. Fortunately, because the immigrants have never attacked. "The bar is a quiet place. Enter and leave the customers. Four are sitting at the table. Arrives Monica, beauty shop next door." My children have only non-friends. One is 14 years old, the other 12. Always go around with two Romanians and two Africans. A Coccaglio are many. But I do not want to leave with them. Is this racism? ". But there is no real reason." I wonder why? Why not. I do not like. I do not even go to their parents. "

admit to being racist and I think it is inappropriate nowadays more and more that this is the impropriety main reason that motivates the false tolerance. Nobody admits to being racist, but if it should ever be enacted a law making it legal and moral racism (brrrrrrrr!!) I'd be curious to see how many would still be said to be tolerant. Racism is more entrenched than ever in Italy, no use pretending that it is not. We test every day. In television news, newspapers, and even more in everyday life. In the eyes filled with hatred of the people on the bus that goes up from their seats in the next because it is accommodated with a person's skin color. In the discomfort that people try to deal with those who are different, in whatever field, in whatever aspect. I will never forget that night in Paris with my girlfriend and two of our friends. We entered a fast food in Paris and one of our friends (although I have not seen more like an exit after this) expressed his enthusiasm for the dishes on the menu ... this before realizing that all staff were foreigners, "Oh but they are all blacks here! switched places ..."

Tech Me How To Masterbate

The license to vote.

Author: Simo

Driving is a right for all. But not everyone can drive, this drive because it involves direct responsibility for life, themselves and others. The attainment of theoretical knowledge and practical skills needed to drive safely is certified by obtaining the license. Simple, clear, crystal clear. Who could deny what I just wrote?
now apply this reasoning to drive, but the voting.

What does it mean to vote? Voting is not just to express a preference. Means deciding vote of life, themselves and others. Having noted this, it is fair to assert that everyone has the right to vote? I would say no. Just because the vote involves more people (an entire state!) It is inappropriate to give everyone the chance to go to the polls because, just like driving, voting is a matter of responsibility towards others and towards themselves. I ask you a very simplified example, but which I hope will give you an idea.

There are two people: A and B . A inform you, knows the history of Italy, knows what it means to talk about fascism, communism, nationalism (etc etc ...), know the salient points of party programs that are subject to election and then click knowingly and a responsible candidate who he thinks will be beneficial to him and his country. B rather not know anything, you do not inform, barely fluent in Italian, has no idea who we both government and opposition do not even know what to offer the most prominent politicians (let alone the minor ones) did not citizenship, and then go to vote for sport and almost unconsciously and irresponsibly chose the candidate better looking or nicer or more who have heard about on TV, believes that for these reasons totally unnecessary to bring benefits to him and his country. Both B that A have equal voting rights, but where the vote of B was different from that of A , should cancel it and vice versa. But between the two that would suffer the greatest setback would always A, B easily because, not having the slightest political consciousness, would ultimately vote not only against the interests of A , but also against their own and those the country just can because it has no idea who to vote for the politician to really get the real benefits! Here are some examples of person
B:

In short, everyone has the right to vote for those who want, but it also has the right to be confident that the elections are held between people really able to express an opinion on politics. The jury in a music competition not put a tobacconist, a lawyer and a fishmonger, but the musicians. Similarly, the elections will give an opinion, not the music, but as to who deserves or not to sit on the couch with a capital P. And so it is right that those who express this view (Voter) has demonstrated its ability to do it, because whoever wins the election will not act only on those who have elected, but by all the voters.

Browsing the World Wide Web I found several forums and blogs that deal with the issue of driver's license to vote, with different and often conflicting. If you are interested, take a trip on the Internet, will treat here the way I develop this idea.

The license vote (let's call it 'pos') should be designed in a manner similar to the driver's license, but deprived of the practical part. Reached the minimum age to vote, it's time to take the POV, without which the vote is not possible. The preparation should be offered by the state, because it is the State that you vote. For a period of study in which we must address the of world history and Italian following an update on the highlights of the programs of all lots in the next election. We then move through the certification examination which, if exceeded, is expressed in the POV POV Once achieved, you have the right to vote. Before each election will require a brief update on parties and programs.

This would ensure that the participation in the elections only to those who really care about the fate of the country and there would be genuine equality, perhaps the true democracy.

seems a perfect system ... But then I remember that in Italy and this makes impossible what was said. It could even worsen the situation. Indeed, who can guarantee that the information system at the base of the POV is not corrupted by the very people we vote? What appears to be a possible means of true democracy could be transformed into the cornerstone for the establishment of a dictatorship. And so we are forced to see at the polls people who think that the current President is Mr. Berlusconi, who is the Prime Minister Ciampi, Berlusconi that if you are against six communities, that if you left you're a jerk, who does not know What is the Constitution, which does not know what ideas are proposed by politicians (not even those who vote at the end) and I could go on forever because the museum's entrance and the Italian political ignorance has no exit. Moreover, it is ignorance that feeds the current policy, the current policy does not exist in a country where the majority of voters educated and informed. There followed a public part of the intervention of the magistrate Nicola Gratteri the program that weather, with the quotation of a sentence, set out therein, relating to what has just said.

Whoever is in power, be it right or left, does not want a justice system and a strong school system that works, because having a strong judicial system means you can then also control the manipulator, a school effective means of educated people, children educated, erudite people, and then thinking people who can not accept or get used to certain ways of life or certain situations, under certain conditions.

Sample Opeing Remarks For Church

A lesson in Marxism.

Author: Simo

You know those guys who stop you in the street every damn time you get out of university or even at home there is a buzz to convince you to participate in the ' courses in Marxism 'and acqistare this newspaper?

After years of repeated denials and head bowed, I jumped at the offer of a friend of mine: "I participate in my first meeting of the Communist fight today, you make my company?" For deep friendship and itchy curiosity I could not say no. At the scheduled time (15:15) we met outside Palazzo Nuovo (the main building of the University of Turin) and then bring us in the Hall 22. The 'lesson of Marxism' began around 15.30, when a boy in shirt and tie, he sat behind his desk and began to speak.
would be impossible for me to present here the speech (which lasted 1 hour) in its entirety, what I can do is give you a brief overview of the message which has been transmitted.

First, the speaker has launched an attack on the ideology that now depopulated, focusing in particular on the environmentalists. It is not possible in a capitalist world, to safeguard everyone and everything: for someone who is good there is always someone else who pays. So NO to all ideologies. The criticism here I was running away spontaneously: "But Marxism is not an ideology?" Is likely to be prepared for this kind of criticism, this guy was promptly before adding that Marxism is not an ideology but a method, a "toolbox" for building a better social and economic system. I will return later to this point.

Soon after, the'insegnante of Marxism 'has spoken a couple of statements that I was shocked to say the least: who wants to join the party shall abstain from voting and do not use drugs, nor light nor heavy. This is because any vote for any party is a contribution to strengthening the roots of capitalism and because all drugs are instruments of control and capitalist profit. Here again, I ask you to wait, I promise that after each piece of the puzzle will be back in place to outline the contours of this experience.

Continuing in his speech , the boy shirt explained that in the world history of communism Marxist methodologies have been applied only once: during the revolution bolševica and the government of Lenin.

In the debate that followed the speech I asked the following question: "Do you say that communism is a perfect system and that under Lenin was fully applied, but then what went wrong?" The response has been swift and well prepared, "After Lenin's death can no longer speak of true communism, because Stalin established with the power state capitalism (disguised as communism) and ferociously suppressed all real participants of the revolution, all true communists . Communism would have worked, but was eradicated by violence of a dictatorship. "Not being knowledgeable about the history of the period, I preferred not to fight back, there's always time for that.

During the debate, another listener asked a good question (ed. adorning and summarize a bit ') : "But why capitalism should not work? It seems to me that perfectly reflects the spirit of man. The need to dominate the others, of adding more and more, indifference, selfishness, sad to say, but they are all aspects intrinsic to the human spirit. "Again, packaged and ready answer:" I do not agree. Throughout history, what has allowed humanity to evolve, to grow and develop, was not competition but cooperation. So, even if it were true what you say, to search for his own good, we would still fight his own nature and seek the collaboration between individuals and not competition. "

The last topic was the sale of their newspaper. We were told that the sale of the newspaper is the soul of their party, because it is their primary method of educating minorities interested in Marxism and acquire funds for the construction of a European Marxist-style. This is not to find themselves isolated and disorganized, as happened to bolševichi, when there will be the next world war (not IF, but WHEN), that can be stopped only with another communist revolution, just as it did in '17.

here at the end of the speech, he left the debate, which highlights (beyond those I already mentioned above) are summed up in criticism of the style it's written in their journal (and definitely not suitable for complicated to involve most of the already few readers) and the fact that the name 'communist' is too compromised by history and its meaning distorted by people who have raised a fist and then did the exact opposite of what Marxism teaches. Unfortunately, on these two points, the speaker has shown a certain narrow-mindedness, hanging him on flimsy grounds to be able to say "no, this does not change." Then

greetings, handshakes and everyone on their way ... more or less. Just out of the classroom, one of the Communists rushed to make the funny guy with me and my friend. It 'was a very uncomfortable feeling, and I find even offensive to our intelligence really considers me so stupid as to not understand what's going on? I'll explain: in that room, and the cravat he spoke, you and others have not paid attention to the speech, but who seemed really interested (and therefore a possible prey) among those who listened. My friend and I had certainly shown a great interest in the issue, we place a lot of questions, seem active. And so we have unleashed the dog back on duty with the task of making the holidays, and then lick sweet eyes. Unfortunately for him, we immediately knew what was going on and we got rid of with indifference. Add a detail that soon will be relevant: the community of which I have just spoken to (party member) was holding a cigarette.

And now the moment I like best: put together the pieces of the puzzle and create an image defined by what I saw and heard.

starting with the question 'no drugs'. You, the communist teacher of Marxism, I have come to despise and refuse to say that any use of drugs, because they are methods used to control and profit from capitalism to keep us under control ... But come and tell me with a Marlboro in his hand? How can you expect to be taken seriously if you shoot a gaffe like this? It seemed to be in a cartoon Vauro ... Cigarettes are not categorized as drugs, but their sale is certainly a major source of income of capitalism!

also escapes me one thing: you Communists, what do you do here and now to change the world? Are you holding back, then do not vote, ergo not changed either good or bad, the political state. Listening to you, the idea that one does to you is this: a group of vendors newspapers that are indoctrination sessions in order to recruit other sellers of newspapers, to produce other papers that require other sellers of newspapers, etc etc ... And all for what? To build, in a matter of who knows how long, a European Marxist party, made up of minorities (in your own words) which can support and manage any future communist-style revolution bolševico which should stop any future World War III will be the 'climax of the crisis of capitalism. Mmm ... but this is not the name of idealism? And you were not opposed to the ideologies?

do not know, maybe I'm overly critical, but your whole belief falters before my eyes a lot. Then, for heaven's sake, was my first and only 'lesson of Marxism' and certainly I intend to deepen and invite everyone to try at least once to listen to them because they have so many good ideas as ideas rather questionable, but it's already better than what we hear from our politicians, sure.

Without a doubt, my opinion could have been more successful had it not been for the hound of the Polytechnic recruiter that we ran after scondinzolando when we left the classroom. When I told him not to want to sell people something they do not know well and wanted to pursue, before enrolling in a party, he replied with a chilling phrase: "Oh but look, there are more than 40 thick books to read so if you want a well informed, not want to read them all! You should start with small steps and started to sell the newspaper and then, slowly, to learn and study. " Sure, it's more important to sell the newspaper to know what's written. Got it.

What Does Khair Mean In Arabic

Can I play too?

Author: Enrica

From an interview with Confalonieri (Berlusconi's close friend and collaborator, shoulder etc etc ...), about Silvio.

The sense of the state? The judiciary is important.
"The judges are powerful and are keen to do so. Berlusconi defends itself. "
Running away from the processes, changing laws
... "The laws ad personam? The suits protect themselves. If you do not go inside the law ad personam. Once inside, then do not apologize. It is the system of justice n Italy. The magistrates are the ones who never pay: irresponsible. "
Because judges have it with him?
"is seen as a parvenu, as an intruder."
Yet?
"But he's a genius " .
But what was the anticommunism if communism was no longer there?
"There were the effects of communist hangover. There was still the fear of communism. "
And Berlusconi took advantage. Marketing.
"But even politics."
Berlusconi told him that the Communists are gone?
"I'll tell you. But one must admit that is a great selling point. "
policy and marketing ...
"If it works ... After all the others, even to sell copies, they give the pedophile. "
lot of ambition ...
"Okay, was full of himself, he felt better than those he saw around him. He has a natural superiority complex. One could say that is a bit 'Bausch. But he has shown he's good: it can afford these things. "
She once said: " Berlusconi is a good Ceausescu " . "I meant an enlightened sovereign, like the Sun King."
He says: "Unfortunately I do not have fifty percent" ... "Treat not like. The find it difficult to acknowledge that democracy puts the brakes. Silvio is a man of action. The brakes feel uncomfortable. But as they say is not a dictator. "

This lengthy interview with Confalonieri (taken from lastampa.it ) I was very impressed. Confalonieri, right, speaks as a friend of Silvio. Quietly, exposes flaws and, most importantly, the merits of his dear friend the President. We ride on, lighten the facts, the advocates accusing the other parties (friends do), talks about some of his political moves as bravado.

Well, Faithful, you're a good friend. On the other then you've traveled the world together by a piano bar on cruise ships. But try to understand. It is no longer a game, this. Silvio is now chairman of the board .. the shit that does not relate to you two, but almost 60 million people. More people abroad.

Your friend Silvio has his way, and you along with him. Did you enjoy it, you have enriched, have become important. Now you think you tell him that it is not good at playing the president of the council? Someone explained it to him the rules before? Perhaps did not understand! After so long, one forgets. It should be allowed to cool ideas. The rules are explained in the Italian Constitution, remember?

Then, one might add one more thing. Silvio is not the only player in this crazy game. Ideally, we would be many. A bit 'all, everyone is free to attend. I did not understand because you always do Silvio win. Not taught him that in every game and there is no winner who loses? Perhaps they do win because it's annoying to see him cry, squirm, get angry, yell .. Well, yes, maybe yes. After a while, 'one gets tired, he has no desire and surrender, "Okay, you win. Happy? ".

Finally, here another taste of the interview.

I saw his grave in the mausoleum of Arcore.
"nonsense ..." He made

him ... "But oh! A bit 'of megalomania want to give it to him? "
E diamogliela ...
" I would have done what he did if it were a bit' megalomaniac '.

Here, just the word I was looking for. Megalomaniac. Only a megalomaniac can put half of 60 million people to make his pigs comfortable. Only a megalomaniac needs around the world spotlight focused on him to feel achieved. Only a megalomaniac is always allowed to win or lose the most, but not in the Regulation. Because there are no jump or turn penance for megalomaniacs.

Because there are no jump or turn penance for megalomaniacs?

Watch Otome Ikusa Valkyrie

The S stands for Silvio.

Author: Simo

Rome, November 1 (AGI) - Friday, opening at Massimo D'Alema, the temptation to svelenire the political climate. Today, a hard thrust, a promise that will discuss: Although I condemn, I do not resign. Silvio Berlusconi, interviewed by Bruno Vespa, tackles the thorny topic of his trial, broken after the failure of the Lodo Alfano. The Knights pressed "I have faith in the existence of serious judges whose judgments are set based on the facts" . But then he adds: "If there was a conviction in processes like these, we would be faced with such a subversion of the truth all the more reason to feel the duty to stand in my place to defend democracy and the rule of law" . The prime minister does not just swear that it will have to until the end, but is also involved in the process on Mills: "It 's a ruling that will certainly be annulled by the Supreme Court." For Berlusconi, On the other hand, the prime minister suffers an international campaign "started from 'Republic' and'Espresso ', to throw mud on me."

Source: http://www.apcom.net/newspolitica/20091101_050840_3f88790_74939.html

You read that right? You focused on the phrases that I have put in bold? I would never misunderstand, I tell you what I assume I am and if you disagree, comment freely.

Basically, our Premier Silvio Berlusconi says he has full confidence in the Italian judiciary and then adds that if it were to be convicted of that judiciary would be a mistake or, worse, a diabolical plan to eradicate it from his chair ... and then it would still be in place to fight evil alongside Mazinger and UFO Robot.

Here, at this point I wonder, that limits a political figure who, although under condemnation, however, continues to exercise his office, though polluted by the crimes committed? And above all, what reduces the decision-making power of the people on who should sit on that chair?

I do not doubt that nearly 35% of Italian voters (a majority share) in the last election voted for Berlusconi's party, but Berlusconi who Cast time was not under condemnation. It is not a difference at all. In the event that really was condemned to "defend democracy" should at least agree to hold new elections, so as to allow those who voted earlier to decide whether the fact that it is doomed to be a problem or less and thus keep it in place or if you elect someone else. Unfortunately in Italy there is no law that will force the Premier to act in a democratic way and I doubt one can appeal to its morality.

Premier but adds that it would be condemned if it was a "subversion of the truth" and then we are faced with a dilemma: is aut acquitted, and then the judiciary works well and you can still trust the Italian justice aut is sentenced, and then the judiciary is nothing but a bunch of communist conspirators who want to frame him. In any case, his resignation are not covered.

But where does this come to pass? So if Berlusconi loses the next election it would be fraud and therefore would remain in place? Should not be re-elected, the people accuse of conspiring against him and would remain in place, perhaps by continuing to assert that 70% of Italians with him?

Never underestimate the power of words. With those words Silvio Berlusconi said that there is a legal fact that it could put in a position to be removed from office, nothing more and nothing less. So where is the democracy if the people no longer has a real power of choice? Where is the equality if the Premier can afford to commit any offense and pass always smooth, accusing the judges of inefficiency or even conspiracy? Where is justice if the most basic laws of our Constitution are violated (ent) ate?